HubSpot + Salesforce scoring built on deal-size × SQL distribution analysis. Routes A+/A leads to priority sales queues; recycles D/F for nurture.
FRAMEWORK
Grades issued across 7 scoring inputs
11 Tiers
A+ → F · 0-10 pts per dimension · composite score drives routing
Built in HubSpot, synced to Salesforce. Retroactive scoring on 2016 data validated the weight mix before go-live.
App-form Conversion
2.0×
vs prior baseline
Social Engagement Growth
+400%
YoY surround-the-buyer
Closed-Deal Avg Form Subs
12
vs 10 for SQLs · engagement signal
On-Demand Demo Share of Deals
52%
primary first-conversion driver
Top Deal Sources
Org + Capterra
larger deal size vs paid social/direct
Scoring Dimensions Weighted
7
firmographic · behavioral · source
The Problem This Solved
Sales was working every MQL equally — flattening the difference between a Hospital Compliance Director and a self-employed consultant.
A+
routed to priority queue · same-day call
D / F
recycled to nurture · no sales touch
Grade Distribution of Scored Leads
Composite score → letter grade (A+ through F)
Illustrative distribution based on 2017 model logic. Actual shape: most leads cluster in the B/C range; A+/A is the short head that drives outsized pipeline.
SQL → Deal by Tier
The payoff of scoring: where sales time should go
A+/A leads close at multiples of the rate of C/D leads — justifies the tier routing and nurture recycle.
The 7 Scoring Dimensions
Each worth up to 10 points · composite score maps to grade tier
Organization Type
Hospital/Health System = A+/10, Physician Group = A-/8, Payer = B+/7, Consultant/LTC = B/6
10 pts
Employee Count
1000+ = A+/10, 401-1000 = A/10, 201-400 = B+/8, down to 1-50 = B-/6