Steve Hill · Portfolio
Lead segmentation • CAC efficiency

Squirrels find cheaper leads by sorting acorns smarter.

Automated lead scoring + behavioral segmentation drives 60%+ CAC reduction. Here's the breakdown by tier, channel, and retention curve.

All Campaigns Paid Organic Direct
A+
A-Tier CAC
$47
60%+ cheaper than blended average
Highest-quality segment. Pipelined through Python/AWS lead-scoring. Drove 15% YoY profit contribution.
#
Leads this month
3,847
↑ 18% vs. last month
$
Blended CAC
$114
↓ 8% vs. last month
×
Paid ROAS
3.24x
↑ 0.18x vs. Q1
%
90d Retention
64.2%
↑ 2.1pp YoY
CAC by Lead Segment
Current quarter vs. prior • lower = more efficient
Current Prior
A-tier has the lowest CAC; D-tier is volume play — still contribution-positive when retained through day-90.
CAC by Channel
Acquisition cost breakdown across traffic sources
Organic pulls the cheapest acquisition cost; direct is surprisingly high — a signal to audit brand-defense spend.
Retention by Tier (0 → 180 days)
Cohort retention curve — A-tier is what you keep paying less to acquire
A-tier holds 59% at day 180; D-tier collapses to 22%. This is why segment-level CAC matters more than blended.